救助义务法律化的美国路径及理论The American Path to the Legalization of the Duty to Rescue and Its Theory
成家全;
摘要(Abstract)：
保障人权是美国法庭化解救助义务道德困境的法律基石,捍卫生命是法官追求人性至善的道德情怀。文章在其实质合理性的基础上,否定自冒风险、区别真假不作为、解释可转嫁性过失,证明司法调整救助义务的形式合理性。
关键词(KeyWords)： 救助义务;不作为;可转嫁性过失
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Authors): 成家全;
参考文献(References)：
- [1]James Barr Ames.Law and morals[J].Harvard Law Review,1908,22(2):111-113.
- [2]John Lee Eighmy.Religious liberalism in the south during the progressive era[J].Church History,1969,38(3):359-372.
- [3]Jennifer Alexander.Efficiencies of balance:Technical efficiency,popular efficiency,and arbitrary standards in the late progressive era USA[J].Social Studies of Science,2008,38(3):323-349.
- [4]Aaron Kirschenbaum.The bystander’s duty to rescue in jewish law[J].The Journal of Religious Ethics,1980,8(2):204-226.
- [5]李龙,汪习根.法理学[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2011:425.
- [6]Marilyn Admas,Robert Admas.The problem of evil l[M].London:Oxord University Press,1990:1.
- [7]Oliver Wendell Holmes.The common law[M].Boston:Little Brown and Company,1948:81.
- [8]Imputed negligence[J].Harvard Law Review,1910,23(4):299-300.
- [9]Ernest J.Weinrib:The case for a duty to rescue[J].The Yale Law Journal,1980,90(2):247-250.
- [10]Francis H.Bohlen.The moral duty to aid others as a basis of tort liability[J].U.PA.L.REV,1908,56(5):119-220.
- [11]Imputed Negligence.Voluntary Exposure.Rescue.Pennsylvania Co.v.Langendorff,48 Ohio St.,28 N.E.Rep.172[J].The Yale Law Journal,1891,1(1):39-40.
- [12]W.F.C.Power of a court of equity to appoint a receiver to wind up the affairs of a solvent corporation at the suit of a minority[J].University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register,1929,77(5):676-678.
- [13]M.Kime.The duty to control the conduct of another,Fowler V.Harper and Posey[J].The Yale Law Journal,1934,43(6):887-888.
- 1本文所引用的全部案例均源自西方案例数据库http://international.westlaw.com.